2020. 2. 8. 10:14ㆍ카테고리 없음
Mar 6, 2018 - MariaDB in a Debian-based container on Docker for Windows with a. It also allows us to not dive into mariadb's source and figure out complex. If things have been stopped/rm-ed then this is OK, and probably not much lost anyway. See a never-ending set.
MariaDB does not start at all. I have read the other issues about problems with Mariadb for ideas.
The first thing I tried was to restart docker. I have deleted all the containers and images, restarted docker. I tried with both wodby/mariadb:10.2-3.0.2 and wodby/mariadb:10.1-3.0.2. In all cases Mariadb doesn't start. No not the only one with this error and I'm glad you were able to get it working. Not so for me.
I tried once again, but no, it still fails. I am totally stuck. $ docker rmi 09be1c1e774d $ docker rmi 8a4adaadb9d9 $ sudo systemctl restart docker $ docker-compose up -d $ docker ps -a CONTAINER ID IMAGE COMMAND CREATED STATUS PORTS NAMES 06c23c43f0cc wodby/drupal-nginx:8-1.13-3.0.2 '/docker-entrypoint.' 4 minutes ago Up 4 minutes 80/tcp drupalnginx1 3478f4538c74 wodby/drupal-php:7.1-3.3.1 '/docker-entrypoint.'
4 minutes ago Up 4 minutes 9000/tcp drupalphp1 15ac80b215d0 wodby/mariadb:10.2-3.0.2 '/docker-entrypoint.' 4 minutes ago Exited (1) 4 minutes ago drupalmariadb1 263bdb856cfc portainer/portainer '/portainer -no-aut' 34 hours ago Up 4 minutes 9000/tcp drupalportainer1 a8791e2add40 mailhog/mailhog 'MailHog' 34 hours ago Up 4 minutes 1025/tcp, 8025/tcp drupalmailhog1 3670e893c10e traefik '/traefik -c /dev/nu' 34 hours ago Up 4 minutes 0.0.0.0:8000-80/tcp drupaltraefik1. For all macOS and windows users who has Probably out of disk space with MariaDB container with volumes mounted from the host – there's an issue with docker for mac/win filesystem and MariaDB. If a fix happen it will happen either in MariaDB or in docker for mac/win (unlikely), there's nothing we can do in the image to fix that.
See for more explanations. The solution is to not mount volume from the host or try using -2.x.x version of the image with older MariaDB, seems to be working fine. Reported issue in MariaDB's JIRA: TL;DR: don't use bind mounts for mariadb, let docker itself create and manage volumes. Since docker 17.06 you will lose volumes data only if you run docker system prune -volumes. For me I was able to disable use of of the persistent mount.
Once started I then switched to persistent mount and then run docker-compose up -d again. I also chmod the data directory to 777. This fails on restarting docker-compose. Maybe the persistent storage option is now redundant? This is interesting 'all versions of MySQL work with a host mounted volume in Docker for Windows, as does Percona 5.5 and 5.6' and 'I don't have any insight as to why Percona 5.7 and all versions of MariaDB fail when using a host mounted volume on Docker for Windows.'
Is a reddit for discussion and news about Guidelines. Please keep submissions on topic and of high quality. Just because it has a computer in it doesn't make it programming. If there is no code in your link, it probably doesn't belong here. Direct links to app demos (unrelated to programming) will be removed. No surveys.
Please follow proper. Info. Do you have a question?. Do you have something funny to share with fellow programmers? Please take it to. For posting job listings, please visit.
Mdev-16015 Probably Out Of Disk Space Error With Docker For Mac Mac
Check out our. It could use some updating. Are you interested in promoting your own content? Related reddits. These is a reason to use Docker - that's it's probably inevitable that you will have to because everyone else is, but a lot of these seem questionable: Faster development process. There is no need to install 3rd parties like PostgreSQL, Redis, Elasticsearch.
Those can be run in containers. So, now you can install a third party like docker instead so that you can install a whole linux that happens to have one of these inside it? Service nginx start was also definitely too difficult, one might have to edit a text file! Thank god I can run docker run -d -name test-nginx -p 80:80 -v $(pwd):/usr/share/nginx/html:ro nginx:latest instead. Handy application encapsulation (you can deliver your application in one piece).
It's not really explained how Docker does this-you have to orchestrate all your containers, right? Same behaviour on local machine / dev / stage / production servers. Virtualization promised this and it was a lie, there is just too much state-the real question is how much easier or harder does Docker make it to debug in production.
Easy and clear monitoring. Compared to.? Faster development process. There is no need to install 3rd parties like PostgreSQL, Redis, Elasticsearch.
Those can be run in containers. I understand your sentiment, but using docker to run multiple databases simultaneously is much easier than trying to have many versions of postgres on at the same time in user space. With docker I can test my app on version 8, 9 and nightly without breaking a sweat and can simply destroy the container when I'm done with it knowing fairly confidently there won't be any remnants of its existence on my machine. So, now you can install a third party like docker instead so that you can install a whole linux that happens to have one of these inside it? The Docker community is gradually (a very compact Linux distribution) to solve this. Service nginx start was also definitely too difficult, one might have to edit a text file!
Thank god I can run docker run -d -name test-nginx -p 80:80 -v $(pwd):/usr/share/nginx/html:ro nginx:latest instead. This does point at one gripe I have with lots of Docker tutorials. The right way to start isn't with running docker commands manually like this one does—rather, it's better to jump right in to Docker Compose. You write a docker-compose.yml file like this: - version: '2' services: nginx: image: nginx:latest ports: - '80:80' volumes: -./html:/usr/share/nginx/html:ro # What the heck, let's add a database while we're at it.
Db: image: postgres:9.6 ports: - '5432:5432' # Mount a database init script into the container to create # the schema and load some example data. This uses a # hook provided by the `postgres` image. Volumes: -./path/to/db-init.sql:/docker-entrypoint-initdb.d/db-init.sql:ro.describing what are your services you have, what ports they should expose, etc., and you check it in. Now every developer in your team can just cd into that directory and run docker-compose up. If they mess it up they can destroy it with docker-compose down and try again.
Startup times are generally in the seconds. And this scales to complex multi-container applications. That's the real value. Instead of writing instructions telling developers how to set up their environments ('download this, this and that, install them, configure them like this, etc.' ) it's way quicker to just write a Compose file—quicker for the author and the developers who use it!
It also changes the economics of unit vs. Integration testing, IMHO, in favor of the latter—your automated test suite can now very easily launch semi-realistic throwaway environments to test your application against, so that instead of e.g. Mocking interaction a database you can just use a database.
I'm still on the fence about Docker in production, and I'm actually wary of the company, but I've been thoroughly convinced over the last year that container-based tools are immensely valuable for sure.